Here is the latest Iowa news from The Associated Press

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Voter fraud cases against several Iowans could be in trouble if a district court judge rules Iowa’s voter registration form is illegal. The attorney for a Council Bluffs man charged with election misconduct says the voter registration form has smaller type at the bottom where the person signing certifies citizenship. State law requires the print on the form to be uniform throughout.

Attorney David Richter says Pottawattamie County prosecutors stipulated at a hearing Monday that the type differs. He expects a judge to find the form illegal. If the judge believes that justifies dismissal of charges against Richter’s client, Albert Harte-Maxwell, prosecution in similar cases could be in trouble. Five other people are charged with election misconduct for registering to vote without U.S. citizenship, a felony in Iowa.

Authorities in Adams County responding to a dispute call in Corning Thursday, arrested two people on assault charges. Taken into custody at the residence in the 1000 block of 6th Street, was  53-year old Denny Moore and 56-year old Luann Stevenson, both of Corning. Moore and Stevenson were charged with Domestic Assault, a Simple Misdemeanor. The pair were transported to the Adams County Jail, where they were being held pending appearance before the magistrate. Their bonds were set at $300 each.

The Cass County Sheriff’s Office reports the arrest Wednesday, of 38-year old Roger James Wilson. Wilson, who is from Atlantic, was taken into custody on a Cass County Sheriff’s Office warrant for Possession with Intent to Deliver and an additional charge of Possession of a Controlled Substance. The man was being held in the Cass County Jail on $5000 bond.

The Cass County Sheriff’s Office is making the public aware of a new twist on an old scam that’s going around. Sheriff Darby McLaren says his office has received a report of an automated call telling about the negative effects of a prescription drug. The voice gives you the option to press “1” to be taken off the call list, and when you do, the automated operator requests your social security number, date of birth, and name. The Sheriff says if you receive such a call, simply hang up. Do not give your information to the caller, regardless of whether is is a human or computer.

The General Manager of the Atlantic Municipal Utilities (AMU) and Mayor of Atlantic sat down during a press conference Thursday afternoon, to clarify statements made by City Administrator Doug Harris during Wednesday night’s City Council meeting, with regard to an increase in the fees charged to the City for the sewer billing rate.

AMU Gen. Mgr. Steve Tjepkes (left) and Atlantic Mayor Dave Jones (right) discuss the fee AMU charges the City for sewer billing. (Ric Hanson photo)

Steve Tjepkes refuted the claim by Harris that the 90-cent rate adjustment is attributable to AMU’s new billing system, which was unveiled in December. He said their old billing system had been in-place for over 30-years, and the cost of implementing the new billing system was made by offsetting cost savings. The maintenance, or ongoing cost of the new system he says, costs the same as the old. He said neither the rate increase or the charges they have proposed to the City, was a result of the new billing system. Tjepkes said over the last several years, AMU has charged the City 10-cents per bill, per month, to maintain more than 3,100 sewer accounts and billing processes. He said that rate doesn’t even cover a third of today’s postage rates.

The proposed increase from 10-cents to $1.00, he says is based on the actual cost to AMU to service those accounts. If the fee increase is approved, the annual cost to the City would jump from $3,730 per year to $37,300 per year. Ultimately, the increase will be passed along to AMU’s electric and water customers. Tjepkes said the fee increase he discussed with Harris was a proposal, and not an ultimatum.

Mayor Dave Jones said his reaction, that AMU had “Gone overboard” on the rate increase and should re-calculate their costs, was based on the information presented by Harris, and the shock of going from 10-cents, to a dollar per billing.  He said after discussions were held this (Thursday) morning, he feels the dollar amount is “reasonable,” that the City couldn’t do it any cheaper, and it is “just the cost of doing business.”

Jones said the matter will be placed before the City’s Personnel and Finance Committee for discussion, before anything is agreed to as far as billing costs. If the increase is approved, it would be billed in July, retro-active to January 1st. Jones said it’s likely the proposed increase would be passed along, and on top of a sewer rate increase already planned for later this year.

***********

The text of the Press Release from AMU is as follows…

“In the last several years, AMU has charged the city $.10 a bill per month to maintain their sewer accounts and billing processes. As most people can understand, $.10 doesn’t even cover a third of today’s postage. The services provided by AMU to the City of Atlantic include the labor costs of setting up and maintaining over 3,100 sewer accounts, processing new and final billing account adjustments each monthly, billing the monthly service, the collection of the accounts and the accounting for the funds billed and collected. In addition to the labor costs, there is the cost of the physical bills, envelopes, postage and printing costs.

The increase in the sewer billing rate from $.10 to $1.00 is based on the actual cost to AMU to service these accounts. AMU isn’t asking the city to cover the full third of the cost of billing the sewer services. However, in fairness to AMU’s customer, the Utility Board doesn’t feel that AMU should continue to build the full cost of the sewer billing into their electric and water rates.

There was a statement made that the rate adjustment is a result of AMU’s new billing system. AMU’s billing system had been in place for over 30 years and the cost of implementing the new billing system was made by offsetting cost savings. The maintenance of the new system is the same as it has been in the past. So, neither the recent AMU rate increase nor the increase in what AMU charges the city for processing their sewer billing is related to the new billing system.

Prior to suggesting the change, AMU checked with other municipal utilities of similar size to research how they are handling billing. Though no utility is the same, their proposed rate is more in line with how other utilities handle billing for their cities.

AMU would be happy to continue to process the sewer billing for the city, but if the city chooses to do it themselves that would be their choice.”